Primary School days
In this next posting Yakkity Yak carries on with his account of Primary School days. Teachers, good or bad, male or female leave a lasting impression on the groiwng boy.
“First to P1, then to P2”
Yakkity Yak
School life may be tough, even if classroom life isn’t. Unlike the fortunate kids today, school life was never one of “First to Bata, then to school” We went to school with some nondescript tennis shoes. If Bata was the Reebok of the day, then Sin Wah or Blue Arrow were the crumbs that were brushed off from the table by the rich kids. We had only one pair of uniform and one pair of worn-out shoes that was stitched and re-stitched ten times over. Then, we were also very much at the mercy of the weather and the elements. Deprived of a rain coat and too self conscious to drape ourselves over with a plastic sheet, our uniforms and shoes would be drenched through. This, however, wasn’t the problem. The real problem was that we have to go to school the next in wet or at least damp shoes and clothes. My ever caring mother tried to save the day by asking me to carry my shoes in my bag. Sometimes, she would give me a pair of slippers which was co-owned by many in the family. Ocassionally, if I could take it, I walked bare-footed. But often times, I rather a wet pair of shoes the following day, than to risk walking bare-footed , all the way to school, from Kallang Rd to McNair Rd, off Balestier Rd.
Classroom life was not necessarily humdrum even in those days. Far from being lifeless, there was more than the usual classroom drama and excitement. It must be so because the impression I had of teachers in those days was that they had the license to ‘teach and beat’. They really spared no rod and probably spoilt every child, too. It was mostly the stick approach, very little carrot! If you forgot your multiplication tables, it was whack! If you failed to recite a poem word-perfect, it was also whack. And if you misspelt, you get the whack treatment, too! If you froze at mental sums, you bloody well got whacked, too! You got whacked with the ruler. You got whacked on the head with the blackboard duster. You got whacked anywhere on your anatomy with anything which the god-damned sadistic teacher could lay his hands on. Invariably, these treatments were meted out to those who happened to be not so scholastically blessed. At least, that was the style of some of my teachers.
The drama and excitement, was, however, blunted a little by the fact that I had the same teachers twice in the same year up till Primary 4. These robbed things a little of the shine, the variety and the fun. My P1 teacher was better known to me as ABC. These initials were emblazoned on everything, his record book, the class register and on the class time table, which was incidentally neatly framed and hung up! He was actually “Chua Ah Bah” to be precise. But I supposed since he was English-educated and can speak and write “England”, he decided to anglicise the way his name was to be formatted- surname at the end. So “Ah Bah Chua”, it was to be! And this translates into ‘ABC’ as his initials (QED!).
I had ABC for P1 and P2. That might as well be the case. Nearly all in my cohort first learnt their ABCs in school; save for those privileged ones whose parents (or at least one of them) came from the gentry -class and had an English-based education themselves. These people with silver-gilded mouth could speak English when they were first inducted into school. They were even more competent with the letters of the alphabet than Professor Higgins could teach Mary Hopkins to the tune and the sounds of music! But strangely, the first thing anywhere close to English which I leant in P1 was not ABC, but “Please, Sir may I go out (to the toilet)?”
If ABC was a stern school master, he was extra nice to me. I gave him no trouble. I even had the privilege of frequent rides in his car, not all the way home but up to the main road so that I walk all the way back. During Sports Day, I had extra cakes and ice creams. I need not have the necessary coupons to exchange for these items. He would seek me out from the stands and ushered me into the Common Room, and everything was laid out for me. Humility forbids me to recount but I was more than a model student. He was immensely proud of me and would show me off the teacher in the next class when I did something which he impressed him. Once, for example, we just finished a reading lesson in which the phrase ‘out of reach’ was in the text. He explained the phrase to the class and I believed we all understood. Not long after (say an hour or so later) he asked me to remove a chart which was pinned on the board at the back of the classroom. I helplessly told him that it was ‘out of reach”. He was so pleased with my apt application and usage of the phrase, that he came up to me, hugged me and brought me to the teacher next door and recounted the entire episode to her. On another day in P2, he told me to ask my father to see him. This usually forebode ill. It is always the case when a teacher wants to see you parents. I did not have the courage to ask for the reason and did dutifully what I had too. It was only when my father came that I knew what it was all about. It was about double-promotion which I did not want. Being a little kiasu, I told both ABC and my father that if I go for double promotion I may not top the class. I rather be a big fish in a small pond than a small one in a bigger pond! I was the only one who could bring library books from the little library corner home. He was more than convinced that I would read them, not just look at the ang kong, (Hokkien for pictures and illustrations) like the many others.
I cannot help but say a little more about the teacher next door, after mentioning her in passing in an earlier paragraph. She is Miss Yap. Miss Yap played the piano and fittingly, taught us music and singing. More significantly, she exudes style and elegance. Chauffeured driven to school, she definitely had the pedigree and a distinct aristocratic lineage. It would be an understatement to describe her as pretty as she is more beautiful than pretty. Endowed with great sartorial sense, she is elegantly suited up in cheongsam.
Cutting an imposing figure, she is quite an adornment in front of the otherwise dull and drab classroom. However, as the pupils then were only P1, it could also well be a case of “a flower wasting its scent in the desert air”
“Full many a flower is born to blush unseen,
And waste its sweetness on the desert air."
But no. I was naively mistaken. She flaunted her plumage more for the benefit of her male peers. Sadly too, this Miss Yap was perhaps a little hopelessly helpless and a trifle incompetent, too. Once too often, she would scurry over to my class, Primary I D, to consult ABC and sought his frequent but unwise counsel. ABC, naturally found her misfortune his opportunity!
Showing posts with label singapore education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label singapore education. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Monday, June 21, 2010
Primary School
The Child is the Father of Man
As Wordsworth rightly points out,
''The Child is father of the Man;
And I could wish my days to be
Bound each to each by natural piety.''
William Wordsworth (1770-1850), "My Heart Leaps Up When I Behold (l. 7-9)" .
In his next posting, Yakkity Yak ruminates on the signficance of a balanced childhood education in the intellectual, emotional and moral growth of a person.
Those Primary School Days: The Classroom Years
Yakkity Yak
“What ails education?”
Childhood games and the out-of classroom activities have an often-slighted educational value. Sadly enough, there is still, a not insubstantial number of people who erroneously regarded ‘education’ and ‘literacy’ as mere semantic twins. And how wrong! Obviously they are not the same thing-in as much as the nit-pickers distinguish ‘education’ from ‘training’. These out of classroom activities may be activities outside the curriculum. Further, they may even not fall within the official extra-curricular-activities. But they still form part of the ‘hidden curriculum’, helping to shape and mould minds and attitudes. For the reason that attitudinal training is educational, the moguls, the nawabs and the sahibs of our present day educational system have now renamed extra-curricular activities as ‘co-curricular’ activities. I ask if there is anything wrong stretching things a bit further and re-designate them as ‘co-educational activities’? “Co- curricular” suggests that they are part of the curriculum, co-existing in a compatibly comfortable fashion with one another. Isn’t it true then, that anything that is part of the curriculum must further the larger educational objective? Co-curricular, therefore, is all at once, co-educational as well.
I know I don’t sound compelling. So, I feel compelled to turn over, the yellowing pages of my silverfish infested collection of essays to track down Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Apology for Idlers” to support my case. This classic was beyond my full comprehension when I was first introduced to it as a bumbling, wide-eye, wet-behind-the-ears and ignorant Sec 2 student. It certainly makes more sense to me now, in my more matured years. Robert Louis Stevenson said it all when he declared:
“Sainte-Beuve, as he grew older, came to regard all experience as a single great book, in which to study for a few years ere we go hence; and it seemed all one to him whether you should read in Chapter xx., which is the differential calculus, or in Chapter xxxix., which is hearing the band play in the gardens. As a matter of fact, an intelligent person, looking out of his eyes and hearkening in his ears, with a smile on his face all the time, will get more true education than many another in a life of heroic vigils. There is certainly some chill and arid knowledge to be found upon the summits of formal and laborious science; but it is all around about you, and for the trouble of looking, that you will acquire the warm and palpitating facts of life. While others are filling their memory with a lumber of words, one-half of which they will forget before the week be out, your truant may learn some really useful art: to play the fiddle, to know a good cigar, or to speak with ease and opportunity to all varieties of men. Many who have "plied their book diligently," and know all about some one branch or another of accepted lore, come out of the study with an ancient and owl-like demeanour, and prove dry, stockish, and dyspeptic in all the better and brighter parts of life. Many make a large fortune, who remain underbred and pathetically stupid to the last. And meantime there goes the idler, who began life along with them--by your leave, a different picture. He has had time to take care of his health and his spirits; he has been a great deal in the open air, which is the most salutary of all things for both body and mind; and if he has never read the great Book in very recondite places, he has dipped into it and skimmed it over to excellent purpose.”
So you can clearly see that contemporary educational-policy has turned full circle. “Apology for Idlers” was first published in the Cornhill Magazine, in as early as July 1877. That was a good 133 years ago! Apparently, the views held were as valid today as they were then.
For far too long, classroom education tended to be a laborious and incessant process of downloading knowledge into our cerebral-void; and needlessly so, too! Often, the process takes a preachy, didactic route. Just as often, the process involves knowledge assiduously transferred by the teacher and voraciously sponged-up by the students. Once again, it will be apt for me to quote R.L .Stevenson as he, more than a century ago, lamented that:
“A fact is not called a fact, but a piece of gossip, if it does not fall into one of your scholastic categories. An inquiry must be in some acknowledged direction, with a name to go by; or else you are not inquiring at all, only lounging; and the workhouse is too good for you. It is supposed that all knowledge is at the bottom of a well, or the far end of a telescope.”
But don’t get me wrong! I am all for education and the good that it brings. I am all for “education for education sake”. I am equally comfortable with those who champion the utilitarian value of education and its by-products. The upshot of all these is that I am an advocate of scholarship and learning and everything pedantic! Yet much of my account of the classroom years shall dwell on the less pedantic aspects of the classroom scene.
As Wordsworth rightly points out,
''The Child is father of the Man;
And I could wish my days to be
Bound each to each by natural piety.''
William Wordsworth (1770-1850), "My Heart Leaps Up When I Behold (l. 7-9)" .
In his next posting, Yakkity Yak ruminates on the signficance of a balanced childhood education in the intellectual, emotional and moral growth of a person.
Those Primary School Days: The Classroom Years
Yakkity Yak
“What ails education?”
Childhood games and the out-of classroom activities have an often-slighted educational value. Sadly enough, there is still, a not insubstantial number of people who erroneously regarded ‘education’ and ‘literacy’ as mere semantic twins. And how wrong! Obviously they are not the same thing-in as much as the nit-pickers distinguish ‘education’ from ‘training’. These out of classroom activities may be activities outside the curriculum. Further, they may even not fall within the official extra-curricular-activities. But they still form part of the ‘hidden curriculum’, helping to shape and mould minds and attitudes. For the reason that attitudinal training is educational, the moguls, the nawabs and the sahibs of our present day educational system have now renamed extra-curricular activities as ‘co-curricular’ activities. I ask if there is anything wrong stretching things a bit further and re-designate them as ‘co-educational activities’? “Co- curricular” suggests that they are part of the curriculum, co-existing in a compatibly comfortable fashion with one another. Isn’t it true then, that anything that is part of the curriculum must further the larger educational objective? Co-curricular, therefore, is all at once, co-educational as well.
I know I don’t sound compelling. So, I feel compelled to turn over, the yellowing pages of my silverfish infested collection of essays to track down Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Apology for Idlers” to support my case. This classic was beyond my full comprehension when I was first introduced to it as a bumbling, wide-eye, wet-behind-the-ears and ignorant Sec 2 student. It certainly makes more sense to me now, in my more matured years. Robert Louis Stevenson said it all when he declared:
“Sainte-Beuve, as he grew older, came to regard all experience as a single great book, in which to study for a few years ere we go hence; and it seemed all one to him whether you should read in Chapter xx., which is the differential calculus, or in Chapter xxxix., which is hearing the band play in the gardens. As a matter of fact, an intelligent person, looking out of his eyes and hearkening in his ears, with a smile on his face all the time, will get more true education than many another in a life of heroic vigils. There is certainly some chill and arid knowledge to be found upon the summits of formal and laborious science; but it is all around about you, and for the trouble of looking, that you will acquire the warm and palpitating facts of life. While others are filling their memory with a lumber of words, one-half of which they will forget before the week be out, your truant may learn some really useful art: to play the fiddle, to know a good cigar, or to speak with ease and opportunity to all varieties of men. Many who have "plied their book diligently," and know all about some one branch or another of accepted lore, come out of the study with an ancient and owl-like demeanour, and prove dry, stockish, and dyspeptic in all the better and brighter parts of life. Many make a large fortune, who remain underbred and pathetically stupid to the last. And meantime there goes the idler, who began life along with them--by your leave, a different picture. He has had time to take care of his health and his spirits; he has been a great deal in the open air, which is the most salutary of all things for both body and mind; and if he has never read the great Book in very recondite places, he has dipped into it and skimmed it over to excellent purpose.”
So you can clearly see that contemporary educational-policy has turned full circle. “Apology for Idlers” was first published in the Cornhill Magazine, in as early as July 1877. That was a good 133 years ago! Apparently, the views held were as valid today as they were then.
For far too long, classroom education tended to be a laborious and incessant process of downloading knowledge into our cerebral-void; and needlessly so, too! Often, the process takes a preachy, didactic route. Just as often, the process involves knowledge assiduously transferred by the teacher and voraciously sponged-up by the students. Once again, it will be apt for me to quote R.L .Stevenson as he, more than a century ago, lamented that:
“A fact is not called a fact, but a piece of gossip, if it does not fall into one of your scholastic categories. An inquiry must be in some acknowledged direction, with a name to go by; or else you are not inquiring at all, only lounging; and the workhouse is too good for you. It is supposed that all knowledge is at the bottom of a well, or the far end of a telescope.”
But don’t get me wrong! I am all for education and the good that it brings. I am all for “education for education sake”. I am equally comfortable with those who champion the utilitarian value of education and its by-products. The upshot of all these is that I am an advocate of scholarship and learning and everything pedantic! Yet much of my account of the classroom years shall dwell on the less pedantic aspects of the classroom scene.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




